Editor's Pick

Following an April 23 Kentucky Supreme Court ruling that emails and texts held on the private devices of Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Commission volunteers did not qualify as public records subject to the Open Records Act — Justices, lawyers and advocates are sharing their perspective on what the decision means for the balance of government transparency and personal privacy in the state.

Editor's Pick

The Kentucky Open Government Coalition is reacting to a 4-2 decision by the Kentucky Supreme Court Thursday, ruling that messages sent by public officials on private cell phones or email accounts are not public records — therefore not subject to the Open Records Act (ORA).

  • Updated

“We hate to cut personnel. We certainly hate to cut programs. But if forced to do so, one of the first areas that we would have to look at wou…

  • Updated

“A public record is not limited by its format— print, digital, or otherwise—nor by its location. Rather, it is the nature, content and purpose…